Andres
Bonifacio will always be regarded as the icon of the Cry of Pugadlawin. He will
always be the avid follower of Rizal's writing and he will always be the Father
of Katipunan. His contribution to the Philippine revolution left a huge mark as
it paved the way to attain independence from Spain. He may not be the founding
persona of KKK but he was the most iconic and highly regarded Supremo of the
organization. As he encountered attacks, dismissal, criticism, disapproval
during his time and shortly his death, his credibility was put into test until
the end.
The Tejeros convention had two parts and on both instances Aguinaldo emerged as the victor, while Bonifacio was downgraded from being a supremo to a secretary for internal. The members of the convention also questioned his capacity to work in the said position as his educational background was criticized.
Ultimately, we can compare what happened in the past to our local and national politics. Politicians seize their positions and use it to their advantage. In Calbayog City, Samar, where I permanently reside, there are only two colors to choose from, yellow or red. The Uy family would be in the Dilawan and the Tan in the red, yet one from the Uy clan due to internal conflict separated and changed his color to red, attacking his own bloodline for the money, the status and the power at stake. The head of the Uy family was shot in a meeting de avance and died after, in 2010. The suspect came from the other party yet the case still hasn't moved on nine years after. There will always be a repeat in history, a pattern, a recurring core issue in the Philippine Government. Distrust, prioritizing the color more and resorting to killing the opposite site just to eliminate a strong candidate for office. Killing Bonifacio for being a threat to the position can be compared to this. And he and his brothers' account for treason which led to their deaths shows today's issue of EJK, death without the proper litigation.
This reflects that the Philippines is still strongly entangled with the system that every group of people is independent, that one group is higher than the other and that no uniting force is able to shatter this force hindering the country to be free from intensely destructive political turmoil. We are who we are, and others will always be others mentality is indeed difficult to forever dismiss yet as we journey to the new Philippines, we might as well reflect and look back to our forefathers, and relate to our current government, that these political bickering, divided decisions and governmental issues, should be looked upon a new light in order to move on from the past and let history be history, only serving as our guide as we try reconcile and diverge from our deep-rooted political backgrounds, to serve a new nation. This is what the Tejeros Convention taught me.
References:
http://www.philippinestudies.net/files/journals/1/articles/1155/public/1155-1240-1-PB.pdf
https://kahimyang.com/kauswagan/articles/1258/the-tejeros-convention-according-to-general-artemio-ricarteGaleon,
D.
(2018). The Politics of our Forefathers. Manila Bulletin.
https://newsbits.mb.com.ph/2018/06/10/the-politics-of-our-forefathers/